Skip to main content
search

Research on Research › Forums › The differential value of different types and forms of research funding › Feedback from the session

Tagged: 

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • January 13, 2022 at 9:44 am #1898
      Alex Recio
      Keymaster

        Thank you for joining the first RoR Registry and hub Chatter session.
        Highlights of the session

        Use this space to continue the conversations here, add your questions, and leave your feedback.

      • January 25, 2022 at 11:00 am #1909
        adamkamenetzky
        Participant

          Thank you to the organisers for convening this group. Some themes/questions emerging from the breakout group I was in:

          – To what extent are RoR activities inclusive of wider public voices? Do we risk talking in a closed room / is this appropriate (not least given PPIE requirements of all other funded research)?
          – How bought in are decision-makers within funding organisations to the kind of critical analysis that underpins RoR? Is there a danger of conducting ‘pure’ but not ‘applied’ RoR if these stakeholders are not engaged throughout?
          – What is the learning culture within organisations and there a bias of focus of RoR/evaluations towards proving not improving?

        • February 7, 2022 at 9:42 am #1942
          Alex Recio
          Keymaster

            I see the three points as interlinked questions that drive activity with a common goal: implementation. Bringing in public contributors to work alongside decision-makers to generate evidence on relevant matters, will support continuous improvement in organisations and drive evidence-based approaches to good research practice.

        • Author
          Posts
        Viewing 2 reply threads
        • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.