Abstract
Background: Academic sabbaticals are seen as an important aspect of academic life and require considerable resources; however, little research has been done into how they are used and whether their effects can be measured. We explored these issues at the University of Cambridge.
Methods: A mixed method approach including 24 interviews with academics, 8 interviews with administrators; alongside analysis of administrative and publication data between 2010 and 2019.
Results: Academics underline the importance of sabbaticals in providing uninterrupted time for research that is used to think, explore new ideas, master new techniques, develop new collaborations, draw together previous work, set work in a wider context, and provide personal discretion in research direction. They also highlight sabbaticals’ contributions in allowing the beneficial effects of combining teaching and research while mitigating some of the disadvantages. However, it is difficult to detect the effect of sabbaticals on publications using a time series approach.
Conclusions: Sabbaticals provide manifold contributions to academic research at the University of Cambridge; however, detecting and quantifying this contribution, and extending these findings requires wider and more detailed investigation.
Aim
To develop methods and explore, at a small scale, the contributions that QR funding makes to the university research system.
Intended Impact of the Study
A better understanding of the contribution of QR funding and better informed policy discussion; alongside a foundation for wider study of this type of funding support.
Project Lead
Project Collaborators
Contact Project Author
URL
Research Area(s)
Other Areas: Idea generation, funding types
Study Design(s)
Data Collection Method(s)
Participant(s)
Other Participants: Administrative staff in research organisations