Skip to main content

Research on Research Forums Peer-review and decision-making What do you think is the future of random allocation to support funding decision

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • Author
    Posts
    • #1189
      Alex Recio
      Keymaster

        Evidence shows how difficult it can be to rank research projects that, after going through peer review, fall in the fundable category. There is an element of chance in the decision-making process anyway, so once you triage out those who are not fundable and those who should definitely be funded, why not make random allocation a formal part of the decision-making process?

      • #1461
        acody
        Participant

          We are considering this as an option. There is some work going on in this space by other funders and we are likely to await results.
          https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0089-z

          Projects


          It’s definitely one to an eye on!

      Viewing 1 reply thread
      • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.