Skip to main content

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Narrative CVs for team projects #3246
    Alex Recio
    Keymaster

      Additional work to write applications for research funding and reviewing these added documents is a great example of the unintended consequences of initiatives that are inherently positive but might not need to be implemented across a whole sector.
      I haven’t had experience using narrative CVs for funding yet, but have in the past been asked to write brief personal statements when joining panels or committees using the principles of narrative CVs. In those instances, writing about my research experience and research outputs in a narrative format is quite helpful to contextualise expertise in an area.
      This is a good reflection and something that I will keep learning about to inform research and evaluations of narrative CVs.

      in reply to: Transcription services #3133
      Alex Recio
      Keymaster

        Hello

        We are unfamiliar with the Gotranscripts service. The projects that our group has been involved lately have not used a transcription service as we have relied on the transcription feature available in meeting platforms (e.g. Google meet, Microsoft teams or Zoom) to transcribe online focus groups and interview. Using automatic transcriptions require careful checks but it shortens the overall transcription time.

        Best regards

        in reply to: Improving relationships between funders and institutions #1944
        Alex Recio
        Keymaster

          Thinking of this: “helping researchers obtain the research (e.g., methods) and/or ‘leadership’ (e.g., grant writing) experience they need to succeed in obtaining funding”
          A good topic for a Chatter session: experiences in applying for research funds. I’ll add it to our topics for the year!

          in reply to: Feedback from the session #1942
          Alex Recio
          Keymaster

            I see the three points as interlinked questions that drive activity with a common goal: implementation. Bringing in public contributors to work alongside decision-makers to generate evidence on relevant matters, will support continuous improvement in organisations and drive evidence-based approaches to good research practice.

            in reply to: Data sharing between funding organisations #1731
            Alex Recio
            Keymaster

              I believe this might be of interest:
              Data and analytics research environments
              https://www.ukri.org/our-work/creating-world-class-research-and-innovation-infrastructure/data-and-analytics-research-environments/

              There may be a future where data sharing agreements cover a wider type of data and facilitate secondary research.
              What do you think?

              Alex Recio
              Keymaster

                Changing practice involves multiple stakeholders and processes, but when it is directed towards increased transparency, the time and effort are an investment in improved organisations. Results of the work at the HRB in the continued practice of research office staff from accredited host institutions to observe panel meetings shows that transparency in funding decision-making processes is beneficial. Learning about the funder focus in reviewing applications supports researchers in writing well-informed proposals, which facilitate the work of decision-makers and increase trust in the research community and the public.

              Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)